Rewrite as a Rust, Apache-2.0 workspace
Supersedes the Go + embed-Mox design. The Go tree is removed; its
architecture doc is preserved at docs/archive/ARCHITECTURE-go-embed-mox.md
because its competitive analysis and data model still hold.
Five decisions recorded as ADRs:
0001 Rust, not Go — accepting ~5,500 lines of protocol code that Mox
would have given us free, to get the first permissively licensed
Rust mail server. Costs stated plainly.
0002 Apache-2.0, not MIT or AGPL — patent grant, trademark, CLA-free
contribution. Public on GitHub; Gitea stays as the private fallback.
0003 Stalwart's primitive crates (Apache-2.0/MIT) yes; its AGPL server
crates never. DANE and MTA-STS sit on the AGPL side of that line,
which is why we write our own.
0004 Milestones, reordered: embedded inbound is required at launch.
0005 Oracle Cloud blocks outbound :25, so direct-to-MX is impossible on
the launch host. Split delivery is mandatory, not an on-ramp.
Twelve crates in three tiers. Tier 1 (mail-dane, mail-mta-sts, mail-dsn)
is standalone and publishable — no `dane` or `mta-sts` crate exists on
crates.io at all today.
openmail-relay ships the provider table as data, with SES and Oracle from
the start. Oracle's and Resend's SPF includes are deliberately None: a
guessed include turns the DNS check green against a mechanism the provider
does not honour, and mail still fails SPF silently.
cargo check/test/clippy/fmt all green; unsafe_code is forbidden workspace
wide; cargo-deny enforces the licence policy in CI.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JkyvfNJGTshJNE9FtwPLk7
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
428040d964
commit
36b15ddcaf
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# cargo-deny — the licence policy of ADR 0002 and ADR 0003, enforced.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The whole competitive position is "permissively licensed". A copyleft
|
||||
# dependency sneaking in via a transitive bump would quietly destroy it, and
|
||||
# nobody would notice until a lawyer did. So CI fails on it.
|
||||
|
||||
[licenses]
|
||||
version = 2
|
||||
allow = [
|
||||
"Apache-2.0",
|
||||
"MIT",
|
||||
"MIT-0",
|
||||
"BSD-2-Clause",
|
||||
"BSD-3-Clause",
|
||||
"ISC",
|
||||
"Unicode-3.0",
|
||||
"Zlib",
|
||||
"CC0-1.0",
|
||||
"MPL-2.0", # file-level copyleft; acceptable as a leaf dependency
|
||||
"Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception",
|
||||
]
|
||||
confidence-threshold = 0.9
|
||||
|
||||
# Everything not in `allow` fails — including every GPL, LGPL and AGPL variant.
|
||||
# That is the point; do not add an exception without amending ADR 0002.
|
||||
|
||||
[bans]
|
||||
multiple-versions = "warn"
|
||||
|
||||
[advisories]
|
||||
version = 2
|
||||
yanked = "deny"
|
||||
|
||||
[sources]
|
||||
unknown-registry = "deny"
|
||||
unknown-git = "deny"
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user