Add member work history and learning docs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# Agent Learning Spec
|
||||
|
||||
Status: draft
|
||||
Scope: how PodMan agents improve their own prompts, policies, detectors, and routing behavior
|
||||
Status: planned / narrow v1
|
||||
Scope: how PodMan agents improve their own prompts, policies, detectors, and routing behavior
|
||||
Owner: agent learning / recursive self-improvement
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
@@ -19,6 +19,20 @@ The demo claim:
|
||||
5. The new strategy is versioned.
|
||||
6. A later run uses the improved strategy and shows a better result.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Is Implemented Now
|
||||
|
||||
- Shared TypeScript record shapes exist for the core objects below.
|
||||
- Exact signature recall and accepted/dismissed outcomes exist in the team
|
||||
memory loop.
|
||||
- No write path currently promotes autonomous strategy changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Is Intentionally Cut
|
||||
|
||||
- Autonomous code rewriting.
|
||||
- Full autonomous strategy promotion.
|
||||
- Multi-agent strategy debates.
|
||||
- Claims that model self-evaluation alone can promote a strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Objects
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent run
|
||||
@@ -182,4 +196,3 @@ Graph discovery may show:
|
||||
- Rejected strategies are retained with a reason.
|
||||
- Agent traces are append-only.
|
||||
- The system can answer: "What changed, why, and did it help?"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user