Address review feedback on the live view:
Metrics looked fake because they counted raw DB events (test churn) instead of
the de-noised entities actually drawn — e.g. "Open risk paths: 50" for 2 files,
"Learned owners: 16" with 2 ownership edges, and the caption ("Files with 2+
editors") contradicting the number. Now derived from the final graph:
- Open risk paths = distinct files carrying a surviving collision (50 -> 4 on live).
- Learned owners = distinct engineers retained as owners via owns/learned_from
edges (16 -> 1 on live).
- Accept rate = accepted vs total real outcomes.
demo.ts metrics + loop counts realigned to its own graph (3 owners / 1 risk path
/ 100%) so nothing contradicts the picture; the PREDICT/ADAPT loop stages reuse
the same de-noised counts.
Right pane now explains the flow: clicking a node renders a plain-English walk of
its path (flowNarrative) — "Karti and Yahya are both editing auth.ts before
pushing ... PodMan suggested a sync PR", "PodMan offered a sync PR for the overlap
on auth.ts. The pod accepted it, so PodMan learned Karti owns auth.ts." With no
selection the panel gives a mode-aware explainer of what the lit path means. Edge
legend rounded out with editing/touches.
Verified: lint + -r typecheck + -r build pass; Playwright confirmed the flow text
per node kind and the demo metrics (3/1/100%); the metric formula re-checked
against the real live graph (4 risk files / 1 learned owner).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
sb-iam
5e9929f8da