{
  "runId": "base-on-s4",
  "seed": 4,
  "model": "brain-qwen38-dspark",
  "capturedAt": "2026-08-28",
  "rewards": {
    "caught": 1.0,
    "hours": 1.0,
    "evidence": 0.75
  },
  "metrics": {
    "hours_spent": 0.55,
    "reference_hours": 0.55,
    "lookups": 0.0,
    "turns_used": 1.0,
    "rejected_replies": 0.0,
    "false_escalation": 0.0,
    "missed": 0.0,
    "typology_match": 1.0
  },
  "truncated": false,
  "outcome": "solved",
  "info": {
    "label": "suspicious",
    "template": "S1",
    "overlay": null,
    "typology": "STRUCTURING",
    "planted": [
      [
        "T-46",
        "T-47",
        "T-49",
        "T-50",
        "T-52",
        "T-53",
        "T-54",
        "T-56"
      ]
    ],
    "reference_minutes": 33,
    "reference_policy": "fast",
    "held_out": false,
    "tier": "visible",
    "screen": "ALERT A-8199  rule R-STR-01 \u2014 Three or more cash deposits just under the reporting threshold within ten days\n  fired 2026-06-14\n  triggering transactions:\n  T-49   2026-06-05  cash_in         9,320.00 USD  branch BR-027\n  T-50   2026-06-06  cash_in         9,820.00 USD  branch BR-031\n  T-52   2026-06-07  cash_in         9,880.00 USD  branch BR-068\n  T-53   2026-06-09  cash_in         9,730.00 USD  branch BR-027\n  T-54   2026-06-10  cash_in         9,680.00 USD  branch BR-031\n  T-56   2026-06-11  cash_in         9,850.00 USD  branch BR-068\nKYC FILE  C-5480  Bilal Quintero\n  kyc.account_opened = 2017-03-29\n  kyc.country = United States\n  kyc.customer_type = individual\n  kyc.expected_activity = Salaried individual; payroll deposits and routine spending.\n  kyc.expected_monthly_cash = 100.00 USD\n  kyc.kyc_refreshed = 2026-05-04\n  kyc.occupation = delivery driver\n  kyc.pep = False\n  kyc.prior_alerts = 3\n  kyc.prior_sars = 0\n  kyc.remittance_declared = none declared\n  kyc.stated_income = 45,000.00 USD\nTWELVE-MONTH SUMMARY (USD)\n  month            cash in        cash out        wires in       wires out          ach in         ach out  txns\n  2025-07                0             220               0               0           3,410               0     3\n  2025-08                0             480               0               0           3,382               0     3\n  2025-09                0             570               0               0           3,444               0     4\n  2025-10                0             570               0               0           3,454               0     5\n  2025-11                0             660               0               0           3,460               0     4\n  2025-12                0             550               0               0           3,403               0     3\n  2026-01                0             680               0               0           3,351               0     5\n  2026-02                0             490               0               0           3,445               0     4\n  2026-03                0             540               0               0           3,433               0     4\n  2026-04                0             430               0               0           3,387               0     4\n  2026-05                0             660               0               0           3,411               0     5\n  2026-06           77,210             420               0          66,400           3,348               0    13\nCOUNTERPARTIES on screen (top by twelve-month volume):\n  CP-2   out    1 txns  66,400.00 USD\n  CP-1   in    12 txns  40,928.00 USD\nReporting threshold in this jurisdiction: 10,000.00 USD\nSYNTHETIC DATA \u2014 no real customer, account or transaction.\n\nHours spent so far: 0.50. You have 8 replies left."
  },
  "turns": [
    {
      "reply": "\n\n```json\n{\n  \"action\": \"escalate\",\n  \"typology\": \"STRUCTURING\",\n  \"cites\": [\n    \"T-49\",\n    \"T-50\",\n    \"T-52\",\n    \"T-53\",\n    \"T-54\",\n    \"T-56\",\n    \"kyc.expected_monthly_cash\",\n    \"kyc.occupation\"\n  ],\n  \"narrative\": \"Six cash deposits totaling 58,280 USD between 2026-06-05 and 2026-06-11 were each just below the 10,000 USD reporting threshold and occurred across multiple branches. This is inconsistent with a delivery driver whose expected monthly cash intake is 100 USD and who had no cash deposits in the prior twelve months.\"\n}\n```",
      "reasoning": "We need answer user's prompt. Need produce one JSON object per reply. We are at initial state. Need decide what action. We have 8 replies. Need likely escalate? Let's analyze carefully.\n\nAlert A-8199: rule R-STR-01 three or more cash deposits just under reporting threshold within ten days. Triggering transactions: six cash_in deposits between 2026-06-05 and 2026-06-11: 9320, 9820, 9880, 9730, 9680, 9850. Total 58,680? Let's sum: 9320+9820=19140; +9880=29020; +9730=38750; +9680=48430; +9850=58280. Wait 58,280. June summary cash in 77,210, so additional cash deposits maybe T? 18,930? 13 txns. Six shown just under 10k, total 58,280. Reporting threshold 10,000. Each just below. Different branches BR-027, BR-031, BR-068 repeated. This is classic structuring. KYC expected monthly cash 100, delivery driver salary 45k, no prior cash. 12-month summary all months cash in 0, June 77,210. Wires out 66,400 to CP-2 one transaction. CP-1 in 12 txns 40,928? Wait counterparties on screen top by twelve-month volume: CP-2 out 1 txn 66,400; CP-1 in 12 txns 40,928. But June cash in 77,210, not wires. CP-1 in 12 txns 40,928 maybe cash? Counterparty type not known. Need maybe lookup counterparty? But likely enough to escalate STRUCTURING. Need cite ids actually shown: T-49, T-50, T-52, T-53, T-54, T-56, kyc.expected_monthly_cash, kyc.occupation, kyc.stated_income? Also A-8199? Alert id maybe not in shown? It is alert id, can cite A-<n> prior alert only? It says cites ids you have actually been shown: kyc.<field>, T-<n>, CP-<n>, A-<n> (a prior alert), doc.<id>. A-8199 is current alert not prior alert? It says A-<n> (a prior alert), so probably cannot cite current alert? Better not cite A-8199. Cite transactions and kyc fields. Need non-empty.\n\nNeed end episode with disposition. Should escalate typology STRUCTURING. Narrative concise. Since close on alert that should be escalated scores zero. This is clearly structuring: multiple cash deposits just under threshold within 10 days, inconsistent with profile, no prior cash, followed by large wire out. Need maybe cite T-49 etc and kyc.expected_monthly_cash. Could cite all six? It says cite facts that decide, not everything. Could cite T-49, T-50, T-52, T-53, T-54, T-56, kyc.expected_monthly_cash. Maybe kyc.occupation/stated_income too. Need ensure ids shown. Yes.\n\nNeed output exactly one JSON object in ```json fence or first {...}. Use action escalate. typology STRUCTURING. cites list. narrative.\n\nNeed consider if there is possibility rule artefact? No. Cash deposits just under threshold across multiple branches within ten days. Strong structuring. Should escalate.\n\nNeed maybe lookup prior alerts? Not necessary. But could be previously reviewed? kyc.prior_alerts=3. But no detail. However rule is structuring, likely should escalate even if prior. Could lookup prior_alerts to see if same pattern previously reviewed, but if previously reviewed maybe close? But the alert is new June pattern. Prior alerts could be false? But cost 0.4. We have enough. Need not waste.\n\nNeed ensure JSON valid. Use:\n{\n  \"action\": \"escalate\",\n  \"typology\": \"STRUCTURING\",\n  \"cites\": [\"T-49\", \"T-50\", \"T-52\", \"T-53\", \"T-54\", \"T-56\", \"kyc.expected_monthly_cash\", \"kyc.occupation\"],\n  \"narrative\": \"Six cash deposits totaling 58,280 USD between 2026-06-05 and 2026-06-11 were each just below the 10,000 USD reporting threshold and occurred at multiple branches, inconsistent with a delivery driver whose expected monthly cash intake is 100 USD and who had no cash deposits in the prior twelve months. June also shows a 66,400 USD wire out.\"\n}\n\nNeed check narrative mentions June wire out but not cited? It's okay. Could cite CP-2? CP-2 is on screen, id shown. Could cite CP-2 for wire out. But not necessary. If cite CP-2, it's shown. Could include CP-2 to support rapid movement? Typology structuring. The rule is structuring. Cite T and kyc. Maybe include kyc.expected_monthly_cash and kyc.prior_alerts? No.\n\nNeed only one JSON object. final. Ensure no extra text? They say each reply must be exactly ONE JSON object (in fence, or as first {...}). We can output fenced JSON. That's okay. Need no analysis. final.\n",
      "call": {
        "promptTokens": 1624,
        "completionTokens": 1516,
        "reasoningTokens": null,
        "durationMs": 62882,
        "finishReason": "stop"
      },
      "info": {
        "action": {
          "action": "escalate",
          "typology": "STRUCTURING",
          "cites": [
            "T-49",
            "T-50",
            "T-52",
            "T-53",
            "T-54",
            "T-56",
            "kyc.expected_monthly_cash",
            "kyc.occupation"
          ],
          "narrative": "Six cash deposits totaling 58,280 USD between 2026-06-05 and 2026-06-11 were each just below the 10,000 USD reporting threshold and occurred across multiple branches. This is inconsistent with a delivery driver whose expected monthly cash intake is 100 USD and who had no cash deposits in the prior twelve months."
        },
        "rejection": null,
        "observation": "Disposition recorded. The episode is over."
      }
    }
  ]
}
