Move the canonical repo to Gitea; GitHub becomes a private archive
ci / web (push) Successful in 2m42s
ci / python (push) Successful in 2m35s

git.karti.ai/PIG/PIG-Demo is now the source of truth, public and anonymously
cloneable. Every self-link in the site and the docs repoints there — Gitea
serves file paths at /src/branch/main/, not /blob/main/, so those needed
rewriting rather than a hostname swap.

CI moves with it. An archived GitHub repo is read-only and its Actions stop
firing, so leaving the workflow there would have meant a repo whose gates
silently never run. .github/ is deleted rather than kept for reference: a
workflow that can never execute is worse than no workflow, because it looks
like coverage.

The Gitea workflow is not a copy. That runner is aarch64 and installs pnpm
through corepack from `packageManager` rather than pnpm/action-setup, uses
checkout@v4 and setup-node@v4, and fetches uv from astral.sh directly. It is
also configured `container.network: host` — nothing here needs a service
container, but the comment says so, because that setting cost the sibling repo
three failed runs.

The header and footer icon changed from the GitHub mark to a neutral one. A
GitHub logo pointing at a Gitea instance is a small lie about where the code
lives, on a site whose argument is that you can go and check it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019mt6sHQHEnEYrJZvoMCJSB
This commit is contained in:
karti-ai
2026-08-28 17:11:56 -07:00
parent 1cd1d3bbba
commit 6c2f3899c8
14 changed files with 171 additions and 123 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ https://github.com/recharts/recharts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PIG (Prime Intellect Growth) — Apache-2.0
https://github.com/karti-ai/PIG-Demo is a sibling of that project. The design
https://git.karti.ai/PIG/PIG-Demo is a sibling of that project. The design
token layer in src/index.css and the palette in tailwind.config.js are derived
from it. Same author; the notice is here because this repository is public and
Apache-2.0 section 4(d) asks for it either way.