Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
karti-ai 2ef62c5670 All four arms captured: the number moves from 0/8 to 4/8
32 recorded rollouts, 8 seeds x 4 agents, every one replaying through the Python
engine to a delta of exactly 0.

  arm          solved   economy  consistency    total
  base-off       0/8      0.000        0.122   0.0244
  base-on        4/8      0.469        0.479   0.4865
  cautious       8/8      0.944        1.000   0.9831
  solver         8/8      1.000        0.719   0.9437

Thinking-off solves none of eight. The same model on the same seeds, sampled
with thinking on, solves four. That is the headline, it is ours, and it needed
no training — which is also why the run is labelled an intervention and names
what was done to it, so a sampling change can never read as a training result.

`cautious` is new and it exists to make the reward editor honest. Until now the
page invited you to move a slider and watch the ranking change, and no slider
changed anything, because the solver dominated a model that solved nothing. A
candidate-only player — most informative guess among words that could still win
— takes consistency outright and pays for it in turns. Now:

  only speed matters      solver 0.9859  cautious 0.9606  -> solver
  shipped weights         solver 0.9437  cautious 0.9831  -> cautious
  punish contradictions   solver 0.8312  cautious 0.9972  -> cautious

The ranking really does flip, on recorded data, with one slider. The first
version of this arm picked the alphabetically-first candidate and opened on
'abaci', which made the policy the counterweight exists to reward look like a
straw man.

190 contract checks pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019mt6sHQHEnEYrJZvoMCJSB
2026-08-28 16:42:52 -07:00
karti-ai b601511e7f Wordle module, cross-language tests, and the deploy path
The browser engine is a port of the Python one and CI proves it: all 21.2M
(guess, answer) pairs hashed on both sides to the same SHA-256. Six TS tests,
including the duplicate-letter table and the twelve pinned seed vectors that
keep ?seed= permalinks pointing at the same word the recording used.

Word lists are split by how they are used. answers.json is inlined because the
board needs it before first paint to turn a seed into a word, and a fetch there
means a visibly empty board on a cold cache. guesses.json is fetched, because it
is three times larger and only needed the first time somebody presses Enter;
until it lands, validation falls back to the answer list, which accepts strictly
fewer words. The failure mode is 'your real word was briefly rejected', not 'a
non-word was accepted' — the right way round.

The solver runs in a worker constructed from a same-origin module URL, never
Vite's ?worker&inline: that yields a blob:, and production CSP has no
worker-src, so it falls back to default-src 'self' and the worker is blocked
with no console error. It would fail in production only.

deploy.sh smoke-tests the real public hostname from the deploying machine and
fails on a body under 1 kB, because the bind bug's signature is a valid
certificate over an empty 200 and a local --resolve check passes anyway.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019mt6sHQHEnEYrJZvoMCJSB
2026-08-28 15:53:25 -07:00