main
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 claude
|
18d5f5bfc0 |
Make Piggy part of the product rather than a guest in it
Piggy arrived as a chat panel bolted onto a CRM and then grew a workspace around it. The layout was already right — the audit found the approval card to be the best-designed object in the repo, and the account page's empty panels less finished than anything in the workspace. What was wrong was vocabulary: nobody had written the small things down, so both halves kept inventing them. Piggy was drawn with five different marks — a pig in the dock, a sparkle in the sidebar and again on the model picker, a speech bubble on the Ask buttons, and a stock robot glyph on every assistant message, which is the one people look at most. There is now one mark. The composer, which is the first control in the product since sign-in lands on /piggy, was the only un-adapted shadcn field left: 6px radius against a 12px Send button it sat 8px from. A stat tile had been reinvented six times at three numeral scales, and the same uppercase micro-label existed in five variants, two of them one tab apart in the same rail. There were 63 hand-written font sizes: not a scale, sixty-three opinions. Underneath that, the focus ring was invisible. The global rule used ring-accent, which Tailwind deliberately aliases onto the hover tint, so the ring measured 1.01:1 against the light canvas — no visible focus indicator anywhere in the product, for any accent, in either theme. It is ring-brand now and measures 17:1. The warning, positive and info tones were darkened until each clears 4.5:1 on a card, on inset and on its own chip, and the light canvas moved to 98% so a card lifts without leaning on its shadow. The mobile work is the part worth reading. A landscape phone gave the transcript 28% of the viewport and a keyboard-up phone 16%, against a 45% floor — and the fixed tab bar painted over the composer, covering the safety sentence and half the Send button, because two source comments asserted the bar stood down on short viewports and it never had. Both fixed and measured by hit-testing rather than by screenshot. The composer itself was 64px tall for a blank second line nobody typed, because the auto-resize effect sizes to scrollHeight and scrollHeight counts rows — a CSS height could not win against an inline style, so the attribute was the honest lever. Verified across both themes driven through the app's own control: no horizontal overflow on 15 routes at four viewports, 672 stat values that fit, 297 labels at exactly 11px/500, Escape returning focus to its opener rather than the body on every overlay, and a rejected write no longer reporting "Succeeded" with a green check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
 karti
|
13dec6b4b8 |
Rebuild the shell, add Calendar and Learn, and govern reads
Seven parallel agents and an adversarial verification pass. The three things worth knowing before reading the diff: RBAC WAS ALREADY BUILT. docs/build-plan.md marks F2 and F3 outstanding and is stale — packages/core/src/permissions.ts and lib/mutation.ts shipped long ago. So this does not rebuild them; it closes the gaps an audit found. The big one is that reads were entirely ungoverned: every GET was "any authenticated member", so a junior demand rep and a research contractor could both pull per-block supplier cost and break-even prices from /api/capacity/margin, and every contract's negotiated terms. For a company whose margin is the business, that was the hole that mattered. Adds book:read / economics:read / team:read, a readGuard middleware, and a `viewer` role below member. THE BUTTON AND THE 403 DISAGREED — the exact thing F3 said must never happen. Contracts.tsx never called can() at all, so its save button was always enabled against a server requiring contract:sign; Capacity.tsx gated commitment creation on deal:write/demand while the server wanted commitment:write/supply. POST /api/activities was the one write bypassing executeMutation: no capability check, and any member could mutate accounts.lastActivityAt as a side effect. It is now a proper mutation() behind activity:write. The shell becomes three panes — a collapsible shadcn sidebar with an account switcher on the Piggy accent, a header with real search, and Piggy docked to the right, page-aware and persistent across navigation. The phone keeps its bottom tab bar, which is the thing this product already beat trycompai/crm on, and gains the sidebar as a sheet. Calendar is a projection over thirteen dated sources rather than a new table, because a table would duplicate dates that already live on contracts, deals and commitments and would drift — and one ledger answering the question is the whole argument. It surfaces export_authorizations and compliance_artifacts, which had indexed expires_at columns, schema comments saying they must be alerted on, and no read endpoint or UI anywhere. Learn carries two tracks. Concepts are members-only; the platform track can be opened with a share code by someone with no account. The code mints a scoped learn-only token and never a Principal — every route here resolves a principal and then checks capabilities, so a principal-minting code would be one missing check away from leaking the book. "Only platform-track rows may be code-visible" is a database CHECK constraint as well as a write-path rule, and a test asserts a valid learn token still gets 401 on /api/dashboard, /api/accounts and /api/contracts — the same invariant scripts/deploy.sh refuses to ship without. CD becomes tag-to-ship. CI publishes an image to the Gitea registry on a release-* tag and cloud-2 pulls it, so no credential on the shared runner can execute anything on production — by construction rather than by policy. Both halves of deploy.sh's original rule survive: nothing on the runner reaches the host, and a human still decides when it ships. deploy.sh gains a rollback and a public-origin check, and PIG_IMAGE now reaches compose through `sudo env`, without which sudo's env_reset silently resolved every release to pig:local. Tests 141 -> 261. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |