5 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
karti	10d79fc35d	Shoot the README screenshots, and make them regenerable ... The screenshot section had been a placeholder since the shell was rebuilt as three panes, because there was no cheap way to re-shoot and a stale image is worse than no image. So this ships the capture, not just the captures: scripts/screenshots.mjs takes all ten pages at 1440x900 and 393x852, in light and dark, and screenshots-encode.py halves and re-encodes them to WebP — 16MB of PNG becomes 1.9MB in the tree. Two things would silently ruin a run, and the script exists to encode both. Seeding localStorage['pig.themeMode'] is not enough: the appearance preference is authoritative server-side and adopted after hydration, so every dark capture snapped back to light a beat after first paint. The /api/me/profile response is rewritten instead. And pig.sidebarOpen / pig.piggyDockOpen are per-device, so whatever the last human left behind would otherwise leak in. The run also fails on a wrong theme, a horizontal scrollbar or a console error — three things a screenshot cannot show you. Piggy is not pictured mid-conversation. It is off by default and no inference credential exists, so such an image would be a staged transcript rather than a capture. The README says that rather than implying the feature is missing. Correcting what the README asserted while shooting against the running code: read authorisation IS enforced — createReadGuardRoutes is mounted ahead of the feature routes, and routes/learn.ts and routes/activities.ts are mounted too, so only the HubSpot pair is still unreachable. The remaining read gap is that a grant cannot be narrowed, there being no row-level team filter in the query layer. Counts refreshed against the tree: 275 tests, ~47k lines, 14 migrations. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-13 21:15:45 -07:00
karti	13dec6b4b8	Rebuild the shell, add Calendar and Learn, and govern reads ... Seven parallel agents and an adversarial verification pass. The three things worth knowing before reading the diff: RBAC WAS ALREADY BUILT. docs/build-plan.md marks F2 and F3 outstanding and is stale — packages/core/src/permissions.ts and lib/mutation.ts shipped long ago. So this does not rebuild them; it closes the gaps an audit found. The big one is that reads were entirely ungoverned: every GET was "any authenticated member", so a junior demand rep and a research contractor could both pull per-block supplier cost and break-even prices from /api/capacity/margin, and every contract's negotiated terms. For a company whose margin is the business, that was the hole that mattered. Adds book:read / economics:read / team:read, a readGuard middleware, and a `viewer` role below member. THE BUTTON AND THE 403 DISAGREED — the exact thing F3 said must never happen. Contracts.tsx never called can() at all, so its save button was always enabled against a server requiring contract:sign; Capacity.tsx gated commitment creation on deal:write/demand while the server wanted commitment:write/supply. POST /api/activities was the one write bypassing executeMutation: no capability check, and any member could mutate accounts.lastActivityAt as a side effect. It is now a proper mutation() behind activity:write. The shell becomes three panes — a collapsible shadcn sidebar with an account switcher on the Piggy accent, a header with real search, and Piggy docked to the right, page-aware and persistent across navigation. The phone keeps its bottom tab bar, which is the thing this product already beat trycompai/crm on, and gains the sidebar as a sheet. Calendar is a projection over thirteen dated sources rather than a new table, because a table would duplicate dates that already live on contracts, deals and commitments and would drift — and one ledger answering the question is the whole argument. It surfaces export_authorizations and compliance_artifacts, which had indexed expires_at columns, schema comments saying they must be alerted on, and no read endpoint or UI anywhere. Learn carries two tracks. Concepts are members-only; the platform track can be opened with a share code by someone with no account. The code mints a scoped learn-only token and never a Principal — every route here resolves a principal and then checks capabilities, so a principal-minting code would be one missing check away from leaking the book. "Only platform-track rows may be code-visible" is a database CHECK constraint as well as a write-path rule, and a test asserts a valid learn token still gets 401 on /api/dashboard, /api/accounts and /api/contracts — the same invariant scripts/deploy.sh refuses to ship without. CD becomes tag-to-ship. CI publishes an image to the Gitea registry on a release-* tag and cloud-2 pulls it, so no credential on the shared runner can execute anything on production — by construction rather than by policy. Both halves of deploy.sh's original rule survive: nothing on the runner reaches the host, and a human still decides when it ships. deploy.sh gains a rollback and a public-origin check, and PIG_IMAGE now reaches compose through `sudo env`, without which sudo's env_reset silently resolved every release to pig:local. Tests 141 -> 261. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-13 15:02:48 -07:00
karti	a6167629cc	Move from npm to pnpm across the workspace, CI and the image ... The monorepo was on npm workspaces. pnpm gives it a content-addressed store shared between the eight packages, a lockfile that records the whole graph rather than a flattened view of it, and — the reason this mattered in practice — `workspace:*`, which makes an internal dependency unambiguous instead of a version range that npm may satisfy from the registry. Mechanics: - `packageManager: pnpm@11.21.0` pins the version; corepack installs it in CI and in the image, so all three environments resolve identically. - The npm `workspaces` array is replaced by `pnpm-workspace.yaml`. pnpm ignores the former, and keeping both would leave two sources of truth. - All six internal dependencies moved to `workspace:*`. - Root scripts use `pnpm -r --if-present` and `pnpm -F <pkg>`. Two findings worth recording, both from running it rather than reading it: `tsx` was a devDependency, but the server runs TypeScript directly in production — the container's command is `pnpm exec tsx apps/api/src/server.ts`. Under npm this was concealed by the runtime stage re-installing tsx by hand after pruning dev dependencies. Under `pnpm install --prod` that sleight of hand stops working and the image simply fails to start. tsx is now declared in `dependencies`, which is what it has always actually been. The first image build failed with ERR_PNPM_ABORTED_REMOVE_MODULES_DIR_NO_TTY. That is not a pnpm bug: it had decided the modules directory was stale and wanted confirmation before deleting it, which a non-interactive build cannot give. The trigger was the host's `node_modules` reaching the build context — there was no `.dockerignore` at all. pnpm's tree is symlinks into a content-addressed store, so copying it into an image produces dangling links and a directory pnpm rightly considers corrupt. Fixed by adding `.dockerignore` and setting `CI=true`, which is required in any non-interactive pnpm build. `esbuild` is denied install scripts via `allowBuilds`. Its platform binary arrives through the optional dependency `@esbuild/linux-x64` and the postinstall only verifies it; confirmed by running the binary directly, which reports 0.25.12. Verified under pnpm: typecheck clean, 150 tests / 0 failures, e2e passes, web builds. The image was built and booted against a real Postgres — health ok, `/api/dashboard` 401 with an issuer configured, `/` and `/capacity` serve the SPA, `/og.png` serves as image/png, and the migrator runs from the pruned runtime stage. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-13 04:15:54 -07:00
karti	bfd2f8d95a	Add AGENTS.md — onboarding for whoever picks this up next ... Named by convention so a coding agent finds it without being told. Written to get someone productive from a cold start without having to reconstruct the reasoning from the diff. Four sections carry the weight. The architecture rules that must not be broken, each of which fails silently rather than loudly — intelligence never lives in the API, authentication is not authorization, cost is charged against the full commitment, sold and held are different things. The traps that have already cost time here, with the specific symptom each produces: onConflictDoNothing being a no-op without a constraint, z.coerce.boolean turning "false" into true, grid children needing min-w-0, Drizzle emitting a cast Postgres rejects, the CSP allowing exactly one inline script by hash, and the Prime Intellect API quoting node totals rather than per-GPU prices. The conventions, including that comments explain why rather than what. And an explicit start order. The last section says what not to do, which is the part most easily lost: do not copy component files from the MIT project we borrowed ideas from, do not open self-registration on a shared identity provider, do not put a production key on the CI runner, do not weaken the guard that refuses to serve the CRM unauthenticated, and do not invent email addresses for real people. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-12 22:25:57 -07:00
karti	d36762f264	Scaffold PIG and model the compute-GTM ontology ... PIG is an agent-native CRM for two-sided AI-compute companies: businesses that buy GPU capacity from providers and resell it. Their business is the spread between two pipelines, which is precisely what a generic CRM cannot represent. The load-bearing decision is the `allocations` table, joining a capacity_commitment (what we bought, at a known cost) to a demand_deal (what we sold, at a known price). Margin, utilisation and idle capacity all fall out of that one join. Cost is charged against the full commitment rather than only the hours that sold, because unsold hours are already paid for and any other treatment flatters a block that is losing money. Domain decisions worth noting, each grounded in how this market operates: - Demand stages put `legal` second, not last. Customers do not hand workloads to an infrastructure provider before paper is executed. - Supply qualification splits technical from financial diligence, recorded attributably. Accepting capacity is a two-key decision. - Capacity carries a time SHAPE (intervals + quantities), not a window. Commitments ramp and step down; a rectangle reports availability that does not exist in the month someone wants it. - SLAs model three distinct shapes: none, a reliability tier plus credits policy, and a negotiated agreement. Aggregators generally cannot promise uptime on resold capacity, but negotiate heavyweight paper upstream. Remedies include fee abatement, which is materially better than a capped credit and is not expressible as one. - Export control is a predicate on the allocation edge, evaluated against the ULTIMATE parent's jurisdiction. Country of incorporation is not a valid key, so this cannot live as a flag on an account. - Agent-derived claims land in `facts` with a confidence band and evidence. Only verified claims self-apply; weaker ones await review. - The API never calls the agent. It writes to a leased queue, guarded by a partial unique index on unfinished work. Verified: typechecks clean, migration generates and applies to Postgres 16 (31 tables, 24 enums, 117 indexes). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-12 18:41:41 -07:00