Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
karti 2b50797349 Merge remote-tracking branch 'gitea/main' into feat/revenue-intelligence
CI / verify (push) Successful in 2m54s
2026-08-13 03:50:26 -07:00
karti 74e37f3e76 Lay the HubSpot and customer-lifecycle foundation
Work in progress from the Codex session, committed so nothing sits undeployed.
Verified before committing: typecheck clean across all packages, 139 unit tests
and the e2e suite green, migrations apply to an empty Postgres.

Adds the HubSpot integration boundary (OAuth, client, contracts, webhook
signature verification, sync), a growth route, customer-lifecycle service,
Piggy lifecycle tools, a Growth page, and shared lifecycle/hubspot types.

Two things are deliberately incomplete and should not be mistaken for finished:

`packages/db/src/schema/hubspot.ts` is NOT exported from the schema index, so it
is inert — no tables, no migration. That is the correct order (the shape can
settle before it becomes a migration), but it does mean the HubSpot routes have
no persistence behind them yet.

`pnpm-workspace.yaml` and `pnpm-lock.yaml` are left uncommitted on purpose. The
workspace file contains a literal unanswered placeholder — "esbuild: set this
to true or false" — and this repository installs with npm, which is also what
CI runs. Committing a second package manager's lockfile would make the install
ambiguous. If the move to pnpm is intended it should be a deliberate change
that updates CI and the Dockerfile together.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 03:50:18 -07:00
karti c821b2ca07 Authenticate against any OIDC provider, for on-premises installs
CI / verify (push) Successful in 2m55s
The seam existed with only a Supabase implementation, so an on-prem deployment
had no way to authenticate. A customer running PIG inside their own network
already has Okta, Entra, Keycloak, Auth0 or Google Workspace; asking them to
stand up a second identity system is a serious adoption tax and in a regulated
environment usually refused outright.

Setting PIG_OIDC_ISSUER is normally the whole configuration — the JWKS is
discovered from the issuer's well-known document. PIG_OIDC_JWKS_URI skips
discovery entirely for an air-gapped network. OIDC takes precedence over
Supabase so an on-prem install can leave the hosted values in its environment
file without them quietly taking over.

Three decisions worth stating:

Discovery is resolved lazily and the FAILURE is not cached. Doing it per
request would put the customer's identity provider on the critical path of
every API call; doing it eagerly at boot would mean their IdP rebooting takes
the CRM down with it. So it happens on first use and retries on the next
request.

The audience check is optional but warned about loudly. Without it, a token the
provider issued for ANY other application in the same tenant verifies here — a
token minted for an unrelated internal tool would be accepted as a PIG session.
It cannot be mandatory because some providers legitimately issue
single-audience tokens.

Email falls back through email, preferred_username and upn, because providers
disagree, but a preferred_username without an "@" is ignored — PIG keys
membership on the address, and a bare username must never become an account
identity.

Also fixed a warning that claimed "authentication is DISABLED" on a correctly
configured OIDC deployment. That is worse than silence: an operator who reads
it on a secure install learns to ignore the warnings. The dev bypass itself was
already correct — it keys on the resolved provider rather than on Supabase.

18 new tests, most of them about what the provider must REFUSE: a foreign
signing key, a foreign issuer, a token for a different application, an expired
token, a token with no subject, and a discovery outage that must not become
permanent. Keys are generated per test and the JWKS is served locally, so they
run offline.

Verified: production refuses to start with neither provider, starts with OIDC
alone, enforces 401 on an unauthenticated request, and warns only about the
genuinely missing admin list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 02:32:28 -07:00
karti 853bde2265 Build the agent-native compute CRM platform
CI / verify (push) Successful in 3m6s
2026-08-13 01:39:01 -07:00