The 600-second per-model-call ceiling that capped the thinking-on run at n=6 is
gone: DEFAULT_TIMEOUT is read=None in all nine venvs.
There is NO verifiers 0.4.0. The `version = "0.4.0"` in the vendored tree belongs
to a [[tool.uv.dependency-metadata]] block for nemo-gym, and reading it as
verifiers' own sends you hunting a release that does not exist and concluding the
bump is blocked. The vendored checkout is v0.3.0-59-g4bcb48e5, published to PyPI
as 0.3.1.dev59, and the installed wheel diffs clean against the whole vendored
v1 tree. Pinned as an ordinary index dependency: a path source is reproducible
only on this box and a git URL pins a commit no wheel matches.
⚠️ dev59 changes the default agent runtime from subprocess to `prime`, a REMOTE
sandbox. Without an explicit runtime every eval here exits "not authenticated
with prime" before a single rollout — having already created its output directory
and a zero-line traces.jsonl, so it reads as a failed eval rather than an
unauthenticated one. All nine configs now say subprocess. Nothing here needs a
sandbox: the reward is a pure function of the trace and the harness is null.
Output layout is flat now — <env>--<model>--<harness>--<hex8>/ with configs/,
traces.jsonl and a logs/eval.log that 0.3.0 never wrote. `-o` is the output_dir,
not the run dir; `--run.dir` pins the leaf.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
grand-exchange, bot-detection and drop-table-inference. All three produce
unbounded or irreducible-error scores, unlike the first four, so all three
normalise against a REFERENCE STRATEGY rather than an absolute -- which is what
makes 1.000 reachable rather than aspirational.
drop-table-inference is the clearest case. Scoring KL against the true drop
table would put the ceiling out of reach, because sampling error is irreducible:
ground truth scores 0.900 against the Bayesian posterior's 1.000, and that
ordering is correct. The best estimate available from 1,200 kills is not the
true table, and an environment that demands it is measuring luck.
grand-exchange needed the market to carry structure a model can actually infer,
or profit is noise and no oracle exists. Measured over 120 baskets: the
reference earns 38,821 gp and is profitable in 120/120, random orders lose 561,
and trading only the random-walk items -- which look like the widest-swinging
lines on the board -- loses 16,860.
bot-detection generates naive bots, cloaked bots that jitter on purpose, and
efficient humans who look bot-like on every naive statistic. Timing features are
drawn BEFORE the generator decides who is a bot, so every latency rule sits at
chance. Reference discriminator F1 1.000, random 0.430.
Each was built by one agent then attacked by two independent reviewers on
exploitability and soundness. They earned their keep: drop-table-inference's
first reward let a memorised constant score 0.901 without opening the kill log,
and its reference was 19% worse than a flat number. probe.py now carries three
named fences asserting those attacks stay dead.
First evaluation also lands. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, thinking off, 32 rollouts
per environment: 0.570 down to 0.059, every gate at or near zero, nothing
solved and nothing unsolvable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
kartiandClaude Opus 5