This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,6 +10,13 @@ This decision stays open until the finalists run the same workload. Choosing on
|
||||
repository popularity or a polished demo would hide the risks that matter for a
|
||||
terminal-heavy, accessibility-aware, cross-platform IDE.
|
||||
|
||||
The current vertical-slice result is GPUI-first, not GPUI-final: current Zed
|
||||
GPUI compile-proves the required AccessKit and IME handler paths, while the
|
||||
pinned Floem revision fails the semantic-accessibility hard gate. The app-facing
|
||||
UI boundary must stay narrow until platform AT/IME, packaging, license closure,
|
||||
and release measurements finish. See `UI_SPIKE_SCORECARD.md` for evidence and
|
||||
remaining gates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Finalists
|
||||
|
||||
### GPUI
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user