karti
bcac6aa41a
**The Asset Factory verdict, and it mostly went against the vote.** Nine candidates were thumbed up. One was taken. TOOK the STS crane. Rebuilt in `ports.ts` from 5 unit boxes to 11 — an A-frame mast and apex cap, a forestay to the boom, a backstay to the tail, a sill, the truck-lane portal beam, a machinery house — still exactly ONE InstancedMesh. What was missing is the thing that makes a gantry a gantry: on a real STS the tallest part of a WORKING crane is the A-frame apex, not the boom, and a parked raised boom clears its own apex by only 15-25%. Before, 56 gantries read from altitude as 56 crosses — two coincident verticals with one bar through them and nothing above it — so a berth flattened into a picket fence. Proportions came from both upvoted candidates agreeing independently (hinge ~58 m under an apex at 99-104 m), taken conservatively because Tera's packs already author an 82 m hinge against a real 55-60. The apex beacon came across as EMISSION: `craneLights()` returns bare positions, `nightlights.ts` turns them into one additive Points cloud, 56 points, one draw call, night only, no THREE.Light anywhere. 0.09 units was invisible against the port's own cream emissive; 0.17 — half a bridge head light — is right, and the screenshot at 0.09 is what condemned it. REJECTED all three bridges, city-lights and both aircraft: the incumbents won on the picture, decisively for the bridge. TWO PARTS WERE BUILT FROM THE APPROVED CANDIDATES, PHOTOGRAPHED, AND CUT. Four legs: 14 m of quay spacing is 0.036 units at 391 m/unit against a 0.032 member floor, so 90% overlap. A portal X-brace: the bay is 0.115 wide by 0.38 tall, so both diagonals come out near-vertical and add a lump at mid-leg. Both are among the best things about the factory cranes AT THE FACTORY'S FRAMING. Neither survives at board scale. That gap is the whole reason a factory asset is reference geometry and not a drop-in. Fixed a defect the rebuild exposed: the backreach started a full rail-gauge behind the hinge, leaving a gap over the portal with the beam floating below it. One unbroken girder now. And every inclined member goes through a `strut()` that takes two points in the (distance-along-boom, height) plane, so the vertical-exaggeration bug the module header warns about is no longer reachable — it needs a length and an angle, and there is now no way to start from those. **The harbour works a shift.** It was a frozen tableau: 19 hulls placed from the pack's berths that never changed. Vessels now arrive through the channel, are met by a tug, berth, work and depart — seeded, so two people see the same harbour and a capture script shoots the same frame twice. A ship loses its wake when it ties up, because the wake is the information. **Every still and film re-shot.** The site was showing a Tera that no longer existed — SHOTS_COMMITb7f5c41, FILMS_COMMIT2aa4049, against an engine that has since gained fires, the whole state, ports, ships and night infrastructure. Two frames were bad and are fixed by moving the hour, not by retouching: `bay-relief-day` and `peninsula-day` were white lids of marine layer. Four captions described a Tera that no longer existed and are rewritten to the delivered frame. `california-relief-night` is measurably brighter than the frame it replaces (canvas mean 7.91 -> 10.57) despite the state being 30% larger. Ten budget cells pass, run twice. socal 1,422,025 -> 1,429,993 triangles against 1,700,000, 218 draws against 320. The measured delta is double the geometry because the crane mesh casts shadow, so renderer.info counts it in both passes — worth knowing before anyone reads that number as geometry. Tests 1,540 -> 1,570, server 295. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
474 KiB
1200x630px
474 KiB
1200x630px
