0.8 was one machine on one run

socal.ts claimed a 0.8 second field build for its two focus regions. Three runs
just now give 1.34, 1.33, 1.32 — the published PACKS table on
lumbridgecorp.com/simulate/tera already says 1.3, having been measured rather
than copied, so the repository was the one out of step.

Small, and exactly the drift worth catching: a figure a marketing page cites
should not be a number the repository disagrees with.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/cities/socal.ts

@@ -2913,7 +2913,7 @@ export const DISTRICTS: District[] = [
  * per rectangle: a focus region sharpens its whole row *and* its whole column,
  * so seven boxes scattered across a basin this wide refine most of the basin
  * between them. Measured, on this data: seven regions came to 0.73 million
- * points and a 6.6 second field build; two come to 0.13 million and 0.8. The
+ * points and a 6.6 second field build; two come to 0.13 million and 1.3. The
  * boxes that stayed are the two the camera spends its time in.
  *
  * Where a box is *not* is as considered as where it is. The San Fernando