0.8 was one machine on one run
socal.ts claimed a 0.8 second field build for its two focus regions. Three runs just now give 1.34, 1.33, 1.32 — the published PACKS table on lumbridgecorp.com/simulate/tera already says 1.3, having been measured rather than copied, so the repository was the one out of step. Small, and exactly the drift worth catching: a figure a marketing page cites should not be a number the repository disagrees with. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -2913,7 +2913,7 @@ export const DISTRICTS: District[] = [
|
|||||||
* per rectangle: a focus region sharpens its whole row *and* its whole column,
|
* per rectangle: a focus region sharpens its whole row *and* its whole column,
|
||||||
* so seven boxes scattered across a basin this wide refine most of the basin
|
* so seven boxes scattered across a basin this wide refine most of the basin
|
||||||
* between them. Measured, on this data: seven regions came to 0.73 million
|
* between them. Measured, on this data: seven regions came to 0.73 million
|
||||||
* points and a 6.6 second field build; two come to 0.13 million and 0.8. The
|
* points and a 6.6 second field build; two come to 0.13 million and 1.3. The
|
||||||
* boxes that stayed are the two the camera spends its time in.
|
* boxes that stayed are the two the camera spends its time in.
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* Where a box is *not* is as considered as where it is. The San Fernando
|
* Where a box is *not* is as considered as where it is. The San Fernando
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user